Maintaining the agreement could also be serious obstacles for the United States when we begin to implement the restrictions on the abundant energy reserves of the United States, which we have very strongly initiated. It would have been unthinkable if an international agreement could have prevented the United States from conducting its own internal economic affairs, but that is the new reality we face if we do not leave the agreement or negotiate a much better deal. The U.S. government was fully involved in the negotiations on the Paris Agreement. The President, in his capacity as elected official of the United States, accepted the Paris agreement. The vast majority of recent international agreements have entered into force through executive measures and not through ratification by Congress. According to the National Economic Research Associates, it would cost the U.S. economy $3 trillion and 6.5 million industrial jobs by 2040 if we met all of our commitments under the Paris climate agreement. We do not need to cripple our economy to protect our environment. The poorly negotiated Paris climate agreement imposed unfair, unfair and unrealistic targets on the United States to reduce CO2 emissions. While the current agreement effectively blocks the development of clean coal in America, what it does, and the mines begin to open up. We have a big opening in two weeks.
Pennsylvania, Ohio, West Virginia, so many places. A grand opening of a brand new mine. It`s outrageous. This has not happened for many years. They asked me if I was going to leave. I will try. But even if the United States decided to re-enter the agreement, it would have implications for outsourcing and the implementation of a few months. The delay is due to the complex rules introduced in the Paris agreement to deal with the possibility that a future US president will decide to withdraw the country from the agreement. We have one of the most frequent energy reserves in the world, enough to lift America`s poorest working people out of poverty. But as part of this agreement, we are effectively locking up these reserves and taking the great wealth of our nation – it is a great wealth, it is a phenomenal wealth. Not so long ago, we had no idea that we had such wealth and that we were leaving millions and millions of families trapped in poverty and unemployment.
„In short, the agreement does not eliminate coal jobs. It simply transfers those jobs from the United States and the United States and sends them abroad. This agreement is not so much about climate as it is about other countries gaining a financial advantage over the United States. „The decision to leave the Paris agreement was wrong when it was announced, and it`s still wrong today,“ said Helen Mountford of the World Resources Institute. As president, I cannot look at the well-being of American citizens any other way. The Paris climate agreement is simply the latest example of the Washington agreement that disadvantages the United States for the exclusive good of other countries and leaves American workers – whom I love – and taxpayers to absorb costs in the form of lost jobs, lower wages, closed factories and very low economic output. If the obstructionists want to end up with me, let`s make them non-obstructionists. We`re all going to sit down together, and we`re going to get back to the deal. And we will do it well, and we will not close our factories, and we will not lose our jobs.
And we will meet with the Democrats and all the people who represent either the Paris agreement or something we can do, much better than the Paris agreement. And I think the people of our country will be delighted, and I think the people of the world will be delighted.